Physicians Advocacy Institute
If you have visited the site before, please clear your browser cache to ensure that you are viewing the 2018 materials.
2019 is the third year of the Quality Payment Program (QPP) under which physicians will have the opportunity to earn bonuses, or face penalties, in the form of positive, neutral, or negative adjustments based on their performance in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). This resource provides an overview of the MIPS program and requirements.
This interactive tool will help you navigate what resources and support organizations are available and can provide additional information on MIPS categories, scoring, reporting, etc.
This resource provides guidance for the quality category for individual and small group Practices. Because the quality category is weighted at 45% of the 2019 MIPS final score, it is recommended that physicians carefully review all reporting requirements and weigh all options.
This resource provides guidance for the cost category and the cost measures for individual, group, and Virtual Group participants. The cost category is weighted at 15% of the 2019 MIPS final score.
This resource provides an overview and guidance for the improvement activities category which is weighted at 15% of the 2019 MIPS final score.
This resource provides guidance for the Promoting Interoperability (PI) category, which is weighted at 25% of the 2019 MIPS final score.
Certain physicians and clinicians can have the PI category reweighted to 0% and have the 25% reassigned to the quality category. This resource provides information on the hardship exceptions available, including, lack of control over the availability of certified EHR technology, extreme and uncontrollable circumstances, physicians in small groups of 15 or fewer eligible clinicians, etc.
This comprehensive resource provides details on the scoring across all MIPS categories and within each MIPS category, with a break-down of how points are allocated for quality, cost, and PI measures, and improvement activities.
This resource provides a practice assessment checklist and outlines considerations to help you determine which reporting option (group, individual, or Virtual Group) and submission option (claims, EHR, registry, etc.) is best for your practice.
Virtual Groups participation option allows multiple solo practitioners and small practices to come together “virtually” with each other to participate and have their performance assessed collectively as a group in all four MIPS categories.
As an alternative to reporting 6 individual measures, physicians and groups may report 1 specialty measure set. This resource provides guidance for reporting a specialty measure set and includes details about the measures available within each specialty measure set.